You can create your own rules or use AWS managed rules, such as IP reputation list rules, known bad inputs rules, and more. This will help you understand the supported functionalities common to both load balancers. An NLB is best for high-performance, low-latency, and scalable network-level balancing. Applications that distribute traffic on the transport layer use NLBs, especially considering its reliability. Gaming systems, media streaming services, and major IoT systems use NLBs. So when it comes to comparing performance metrics, NLB has the upper hand!
The only similarity is when using HTTPS (ALB) and TLS (NLB), where both load balancers support encrypted traffic and TLS termination at the load balancer level. However, NLB additionally supports routing traffic to another ALB. Why would I use an additional load balancer and increase the overall cost?
I would use NLB for any application where pure TCP/UDP traffic needs to be load balanced, providing extremely low latency, high performance and supporting unpredicted traffic spikes. Choosing between an Application Load Balancer and a Network Load Balancer doesn’t have to be daunting if you break it down into what each one offers. Remember, aligning your load balancer choice with your specific application needs is crucial for optimum performance. Don’t forget to evaluate operational requirements like traffic types and expected load before making your call. Your app architecture practically screams which load balancer it needs. ALB was built for these modern setups, with path-based routing that directs traffic to the right service.
After the load balancer receives a connection request, it selects a target from the target group for the default rule. It attempts to open a TCP connection to the selected target on the port specified in the listener configuration. Each individual TCP connection is routed to a single target for the life of the connection. Similarly, you can also route a UDP flow consistently to a single target throughout its lifetime. For example, if you have multiple database servers with duplicate data, the NLB routes traffic based on predetermined server IP addresses or server availability.
When authentication is configured for specific ALB listeners, the load balancer will always authenticate requests before routing traffic to targets. By implementing authentication at the load balancer level, you can focus more on business logic in your target instances. These load balancers are client contact points and help improve application scalability with secure management. You can choose one https://limefx.group/ or multiple load balancers and configure them when you’re setting up ELB for your cloud environment. Terminating the flow enables load balancers to perform additional traffic management functions, such as SSL termination, session persistence, and content-based routing. The NLB monitors the health of its registered targets and routes traffic only to the healthy targets.
- By choosing the right load balancer, you can optimize traffic distribution and system efficiency.
- Your clients connect directly to your backend instances through the NLB, preserving source IP addresses.
- The Network Load Balancer uses the client’s IP address to consistently route traffic to a specific target instance.
AWS DataSync vs. AWS Storage Gateway: Choosing the Right Data Transfer Service
Instead of directing all traffic to a single pool of homogenous backend servers, ALB can forward requests to multiple target groups based on application-specific rules. Both the AWS Application Load Balancer and Network Load Balancer can handle large amounts of incoming traffic, scale accordingly, and provide high availability for your application. However, there are several important differences between these two that I will discuss in detail in this article, which will help you choose the right one for your use case.
Network Load Balancer operates at layer 4 (transport layer), which means it routes traffic based on IP protocol data, TCP/UDP ports, and IP addresses. Unlike ALB, it doesn’t inspect the actual content of your packets—it just forwards them. Almost all protocols differ between ALB and NLB and are used for different use cases.
Comparing ALB and NLB
By choosing the right load balancer, you can optimize traffic distribution and system efficiency. With a GLB, you can deploy, manage, and scale virtual appliances, such as intrusion detection and prevention, firewalls, and deep packet inspection systems. It creates a single entry and exit point for all appliance traffic and scales your virtual appliances with demand. You can also use it to exchange traffic across virtual private cloud (VPC) boundaries. Financial services and healthcare often require end-to-end encryption or specific security compliance.
Automating RDS Credential Management with AWS Secrets Manager and IAM
For PCI DSS or HIPAA compliance, document your load balancer choice as part of your security architecture. NLB supports preserving client IP addresses and works with AWS PrivateLink—crucial for regulated environments. ALB offers more granular security controls but terminates SSL connections. It can scale from zero to limefx forex brokers reviews millions of requests per second in seconds flat.
Application load balancer (ALB), network load balancer (NLB), and gateway load balancer (GLB) are three types of load balancers used in the cloud. Load balancing is the process of distributing network traffic equally across a pool of resources supporting an application. Modern applications process millions of users simultaneously.
If you need advanced routing features, integration with AWS WAF, support for HTTP/HTTPS protocols, and the ability to invoke AWS Lambda functions directly, ALB is the way to go. As organizations adopt microservices architectures and container-based infrastructure, mapping a single address to a specific service becomes more complicated and harder to maintain. Unlike classic ELB, which routes requests solely based on protocol and port, ALB routes are based on request content. Beyond traffic distribution, ELB maintains service reliability. As I mentioned previously, like ALB, NLB also serves a specific purpose. AWS wouldn’t provide two similar load balancers that essentially do the same thing at the same cost.
- Modern web apps need real-time communication, and ALB delivers with full WebSocket support.
- A GLB uses routing table look-ups to determine where to route the traffic.
- An ALB is a good choice when you need flexible application-level traffic management and routing.
- Similarly, the Network Load Balancer (NLB) performs TLS termination when you create a TLS listener.
- Don’t forget to evaluate operational requirements like traffic types and expected load before making your call.
AWS Data Analytics: Glue vs EMR vs Redshift Spectrum
Ever wondered why your load balancer chokes during peak hours? Both load balancers automatically scale with your traffic needs, but they handle it differently. When you need smarter request handling, ALB is your go-to load balancer. Unlike its NLB cousin, ALB actually examines your HTTP traffic and makes routing decisions based on what’s inside. The load balancer decision seems simple until you realize it’s the linchpin of your entire application’s reliability.
ALB costs more but handles application-layer tasks that would otherwise require extra compute resources. NLB is cheaper per hour but might push complexity (and costs) to your application servers. NLB handles what ALB can’t – UDP traffic and static IP addresses. You can centralize your SSL certificates at the ALB level instead of managing them on each backend server.
The Classic ELB and the ALB share common functions, but the ALB has been specialized to provide users with enhanced capabilities. By combining NLB with AWS PrivateLink, you can ensure secure, private, and high-performance access to your services. The Microsoft 365 Copilot app brings together your favorite apps in one intuitive platform that keeps your data secure with enterprise data protection. Spark creativity and collaboration in any learning environment with a variety of Microsoft 365 apps and free templates to choose from. Your files and memories are secure in the cloud with 5GB of storage for free and 1TB with a paid Microsoft 365 subscription. Anyone in your organization can quickly create documents, presentations, and worksheets within a single, unified app experience.
ALBs distribute incoming traffic across multiple targets, such as EC2 instances. For example, an ecommerce application has a product directory, a shopping cart, and checkout functions. The ALB sends requests for browsing products to servers that contain images and videos but don’t need to maintain open connections. By comparison, it sends shopping cart requests to servers that maintain many client connections and save cart data for a long time. These load balancers support different protocols to handle specific types of traffic and perform advanced functions. ALBs support HTTP, HTTPS, and gRPC protocols for web-based traffic.
For unpredictable workloads with extreme peaks, NLB won’t break a sweat. Path-based routing makes ALB perfect for container deployments where different services handle different API endpoints. Your clients connect directly to your backend instances through the NLB, preserving source IP addresses. This gives your applications visibility into who’s actually connecting, which can be crucial for security and analytics.
By using this hash, the algorithm routes traffic to the same target for the duration of the connection. Sticky sessions are a mechanism to route requests from the same client to the same target. Elastic Load Balancer is designed to handle traffic as it grows and can load balance millions of requests/sec. Moving on to Network Load Balancers—if speed and efficiency are your goals, you may want to give NLB a shot.
What are the Differences Between ALB and NLB?
Did you know that according to a study by AWS, nearly 90% of companies leveraging cloud resources report improved performance and higher availability? This just goes to show how essential proper load balancing is for a smooth application experience. Selecting the right load balancer can make or break your app’s performance, especially in today’s fast-paced tech world. A subpar choice could lead to laggy websites, unhappy users, or even financial loss.






